https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788827 A GST writ petition alleging breach of natural justice was rejected after the record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard and had signed the proceedings. The incorrect date in the impugned appellate order was treated as a clerical error, not proof of denial of hearing. On that basis, the court found the allegation of no personal hearing to be false, and the petitioner's conduct in advancing that claim, together with non-representation when the matter was called, justified dismissal with exemplary costs. en-us Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788827 A GST writ petition alleging breach of natural justice was rejected after the record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard and had signed the proceedings. The incorrect date in the impugned appellate order was treated as a clerical error, not proof of denial of hearing. On that basis, the court found the allegation of no personal hearing to be false, and the petitioner's conduct in advancing that claim, together with non-representation when the matter was called, justified dismissal with exemplary costs. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788827