https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467632 Once a writ petition has been finally disposed of, the Court becomes functus officio and cannot entertain a miscellaneous application to revive the matter on the basis of a fresh cause of action or subsequent events. Post-disposal applications are not maintainable when they seek new substantive relief, and they are confined to limited situations such as correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes or, in rare cases, where implementation of an executory order has become impossible due to later developments. Because the application sought protection against apprehended harm arising after disposal, it was treated as a fresh grievance outside the disposed proceedings and rejected, with liberty to seek relief before the territorial High Court under Article 226. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:52:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467632 Once a writ petition has been finally disposed of, the Court becomes functus officio and cannot entertain a miscellaneous application to revive the matter on the basis of a fresh cause of action or subsequent events. Post-disposal applications are not maintainable when they seek new substantive relief, and they are confined to limited situations such as correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes or, in rare cases, where implementation of an executory order has become impossible due to later developments. Because the application sought protection against apprehended harm arising after disposal, it was treated as a fresh grievance outside the disposed proceedings and rejected, with liberty to seek relief before the territorial High Court under Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467632