<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 186 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50852</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding duty and penalty from the appellant. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice lacked basis for alleging Modvat credit misuse and invoking extended limitation period. The order confirming the demand was deemed not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:09:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 186 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50852</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding duty and penalty from the appellant. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice lacked basis for alleging Modvat credit misuse and invoking extended limitation period. The order confirming the demand was deemed not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>