<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788688</link>
    <description>An amount deposited during investigation at the Department&#039;s insistence, and later refunded, was treated as a deposit made under a mistaken notion of excise liability rather than a voluntary payment of duty. On that basis, the refund was held outside the ordinary duty-refund regime under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and interest was payable on the refunded sum from the date of deposit until refund. The applicable interest rate was 12% per annum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788688</link>
      <description>An amount deposited during investigation at the Department&#039;s insistence, and later refunded, was treated as a deposit made under a mistaken notion of excise liability rather than a voluntary payment of duty. On that basis, the refund was held outside the ordinary duty-refund regime under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and interest was payable on the refunded sum from the date of deposit until refund. The applicable interest rate was 12% per annum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>