<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788694</link>
    <description>Composite electrical contracts involving supply of materials and execution of wiring and related work in Government buildings were held not taxable as &#039;Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service&#039; for the period before 01.06.2007, because the pre-existing charging scheme covered service contracts simpliciter and not composite works contracts. For the later period, the demand was unsustainable as the show cause notice had proposed only &#039;Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service&#039;, and a levy cannot be confirmed under a different taxable category not put to notice. Interest and penalty also could not survive once the demand failed. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788694</link>
      <description>Composite electrical contracts involving supply of materials and execution of wiring and related work in Government buildings were held not taxable as &#039;Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service&#039; for the period before 01.06.2007, because the pre-existing charging scheme covered service contracts simpliciter and not composite works contracts. For the later period, the demand was unsustainable as the show cause notice had proposed only &#039;Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service&#039;, and a levy cannot be confirmed under a different taxable category not put to notice. Interest and penalty also could not survive once the demand failed. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>