<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration of the abatement claims for specified months of April, May, and June. The decision emphasized the importance of proper interpretation of relevant provisions and adherence to procedural requirements for claiming abatements under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central Excise Rules, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration of the abatement claims for specified months of April, May, and June. The decision emphasized the importance of proper interpretation of relevant provisions and adherence to procedural requirements for claiming abatements under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central Excise Rules, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>