https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788704 A miscellaneous application filed after disposal of an SLP is maintainable only in exceptional post-disposal situations, such as correction of clerical errors or where an executory order has become impossible to implement; the SC treated attempts to reopen a non-speaking dismissal as beyond functus officio limits and not maintainable. Later insolvency developments, including an OTS and Section 12A withdrawal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, could not be collaterally used to recall the SLP dismissal, particularly where withdrawal depends on the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom. Alleged suppression or fraud was also not specifically established, so no recall was warranted. en-us Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788704 A miscellaneous application filed after disposal of an SLP is maintainable only in exceptional post-disposal situations, such as correction of clerical errors or where an executory order has become impossible to implement; the SC treated attempts to reopen a non-speaking dismissal as beyond functus officio limits and not maintainable. Later insolvency developments, including an OTS and Section 12A withdrawal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, could not be collaterally used to recall the SLP dismissal, particularly where withdrawal depends on the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom. Alleged suppression or fraud was also not specifically established, so no recall was warranted. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788704