<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788735</link>
    <description>Contractual receipts between two charitable entities do not by themselves negate charitable character where the trust&#039;s objects, beneficiary details and supporting documents show that services were extended to students and candidates from government schools without monetary consideration. The ITAT Delhi noted that the factual and legal basis for treating the activity as paid service had not been properly examined. It therefore held that cancellation of approval or registration could not be sustained without fresh inquiry, and restored the matter to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) for reconsideration on merits, leaving the substantive question open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788735</link>
      <description>Contractual receipts between two charitable entities do not by themselves negate charitable character where the trust&#039;s objects, beneficiary details and supporting documents show that services were extended to students and candidates from government schools without monetary consideration. The ITAT Delhi noted that the factual and legal basis for treating the activity as paid service had not been properly examined. It therefore held that cancellation of approval or registration could not be sustained without fresh inquiry, and restored the matter to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) for reconsideration on merits, leaving the substantive question open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>