<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1499 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788744</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court declined interim relief that would have allowed payment without statutory tax deduction or merely against security, noting that deduction at source remains a statutory obligation unless non-liability to tax is first established. It also addressed prolonged uncertainty arising from pending advance ruling proceedings, permitted withdrawal of those applications, and directed the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment for Assessment Year 2018-19 within the stipulated time while examining the taxpayer&#039;s contention that no tax was exigible under the Act of 1961 and the DTAA. The result was withdrawal of the advance ruling proceedings and a merits-based assessment, but no interim exemption from tax deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1499 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788744</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court declined interim relief that would have allowed payment without statutory tax deduction or merely against security, noting that deduction at source remains a statutory obligation unless non-liability to tax is first established. It also addressed prolonged uncertainty arising from pending advance ruling proceedings, permitted withdrawal of those applications, and directed the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment for Assessment Year 2018-19 within the stipulated time while examining the taxpayer&#039;s contention that no tax was exigible under the Act of 1961 and the DTAA. The result was withdrawal of the advance ruling proceedings and a merits-based assessment, but no interim exemption from tax deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>