<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rejection of declared value upheld on forged consent and similar-goods valuation; duplicate penalty on proprietary concern set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98134</link>
    <description>Declared value could be rejected where the proper officer had reason to doubt its truth or accuracy, and a forged consent letter provided a valid basis for rejection; valuation was then correctly made under the sequential rules using the value of similar Heavy Melting Scrap, and the challenge to valuation failed. A separate summons relating to a different customs broker regulations enquiry was irrelevant because it did not affect the valuation and weighment findings in the impugned orders. A proprietary concern has no separate legal existence from its proprietor, so an independent penalty on the concern could not stand once penalty had been imposed on the proprietor; the separate writ filed in the concern&#039;s name was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rejection of declared value upheld on forged consent and similar-goods valuation; duplicate penalty on proprietary concern set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98134</link>
      <description>Declared value could be rejected where the proper officer had reason to doubt its truth or accuracy, and a forged consent letter provided a valid basis for rejection; valuation was then correctly made under the sequential rules using the value of similar Heavy Melting Scrap, and the challenge to valuation failed. A separate summons relating to a different customs broker regulations enquiry was irrelevant because it did not affect the valuation and weighment findings in the impugned orders. A proprietary concern has no separate legal existence from its proprietor, so an independent penalty on the concern could not stand once penalty had been imposed on the proprietor; the separate writ filed in the concern&#039;s name was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:52:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>