<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 155 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50838</link>
    <description>A computer used in the factory for design, precision drawings and support work connected with CNC machine production was not treated as capital goods under Rule 57Q because its admitted use was not in direct manufacture of the goods. On that footing, Modvat credit was held inadmissible. The denial of credit was therefore upheld and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:14:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 155 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50838</link>
      <description>A computer used in the factory for design, precision drawings and support work connected with CNC machine production was not treated as capital goods under Rule 57Q because its admitted use was not in direct manufacture of the goods. On that footing, Modvat credit was held inadmissible. The denial of credit was therefore upheld and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>