<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1573 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467616</link>
    <description>Failure to furnish Exchange Control Copies of Bills of Entry to an authorised dealer was treated as a substantive foreign-exchange contravention, not a technical lapse, because the documents verify that remitted foreign exchange corresponded to imported goods. Affidavits and an accountant&#039;s certificate did not meet this statutory requirement. Directors responsible for the company&#039;s business remained liable absent proof of lack of knowledge or due diligence. The transitional limitation objection failed because the show-cause notice was issued within two years of the new regime&#039;s commencement. Reliance on a bank clarification did not breach natural justice where it reduced quantified liability and caused no prejudice; penalties were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1573 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467616</link>
      <description>Failure to furnish Exchange Control Copies of Bills of Entry to an authorised dealer was treated as a substantive foreign-exchange contravention, not a technical lapse, because the documents verify that remitted foreign exchange corresponded to imported goods. Affidavits and an accountant&#039;s certificate did not meet this statutory requirement. Directors responsible for the company&#039;s business remained liable absent proof of lack of knowledge or due diligence. The transitional limitation objection failed because the show-cause notice was issued within two years of the new regime&#039;s commencement. Reliance on a bank clarification did not breach natural justice where it reduced quantified liability and caused no prejudice; penalties were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>