<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1690 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467619</link>
    <description>An agreement to sell was subject to bank approval, and an interim injunction was sought in a suit for specific performance. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The amount deposited with the Registry was directed to be returned to the petitioner together with accrued interest, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:09:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1690 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467619</link>
      <description>An agreement to sell was subject to bank approval, and an interim injunction was sought in a suit for specific performance. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The amount deposited with the Registry was directed to be returned to the petitioner together with accrued interest, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>