<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 209 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50830</link>
    <description>Customs valuation must rest on reliable contemporaneous imports of identical or genuinely similar goods, and not on dissimilar products or indigenous price data. On transistors and diodes, the comparison was too broad and unsupported by evidence of comparable imports, so the enhanced value was not sustained. For trimpots, comparison with the same type of goods imported near the same time was accepted, and the undervaluation finding was upheld. The consequential duty, redemption fine, and penalty required fresh determination because the bill of entry was unavailable for final computation, so the matter was remanded on those liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 209 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50830</link>
      <description>Customs valuation must rest on reliable contemporaneous imports of identical or genuinely similar goods, and not on dissimilar products or indigenous price data. On transistors and diodes, the comparison was too broad and unsupported by evidence of comparable imports, so the enhanced value was not sustained. For trimpots, comparison with the same type of goods imported near the same time was accepted, and the undervaluation finding was upheld. The consequential duty, redemption fine, and penalty required fresh determination because the bill of entry was unavailable for final computation, so the matter was remanded on those liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>