<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 2034 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467610</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not entertained because the order itself provided an effective appellate remedy. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal and place the relevant evidence before the appellate authority. The court kept the substantive contentions open for consideration in appeal, leaving the merits to be examined in that forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 2034 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467610</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not entertained because the order itself provided an effective appellate remedy. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal and place the relevant evidence before the appellate authority. The court kept the substantive contentions open for consideration in appeal, leaving the merits to be examined in that forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>