https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788621 The Supreme Court of India held that the bail restrictions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 cannot justify continued custody where further detention is unnecessary and Article 21 requires protection of personal liberty. Because the prosecution complaint had already been filed, the appellant had spent over eight months in custody, and he had earlier appeared before the Enforcement Directorate, the Court found that pre-trial detention was no longer warranted. Bail was granted subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the trial court. en-us Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788621 The Supreme Court of India held that the bail restrictions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 cannot justify continued custody where further detention is unnecessary and Article 21 requires protection of personal liberty. Because the prosecution complaint had already been filed, the appellant had spent over eight months in custody, and he had earlier appeared before the Enforcement Directorate, the Court found that pre-trial detention was no longer warranted. Bail was granted subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the trial court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788621