<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1387 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788632</link>
    <description>Declared value of imported second-hand machinery cannot be rejected under customs valuation principles without a legally sustainable basis, as transaction value remains the starting point under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. Where a Load Port Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate is on record and contains sufficient particulars to establish the used nature of the machinery, a local Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate does not by itself justify re-determination of value. The absence of the year of manufacture in the Load Port certificate was not treated as fatal, and the circular for second-hand machinery valuation permitted reliance on a local certificate only when the Load Port certificate was absent or defective. Valuation based solely on the local certificate was therefore not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1387 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788632</link>
      <description>Declared value of imported second-hand machinery cannot be rejected under customs valuation principles without a legally sustainable basis, as transaction value remains the starting point under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. Where a Load Port Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate is on record and contains sufficient particulars to establish the used nature of the machinery, a local Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate does not by itself justify re-determination of value. The absence of the year of manufacture in the Load Port certificate was not treated as fatal, and the circular for second-hand machinery valuation permitted reliance on a local certificate only when the Load Port certificate was absent or defective. Valuation based solely on the local certificate was therefore not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>