https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788670 A writ challenge to a GST demand order was treated as inappropriate where a statutory appeal was available and the limitation for filing that appeal had already expired. The petitioner was nevertheless permitted to pursue the appellate remedy on compliance with a 25% pre-deposit of the disputed tax within the stipulated period, with any amount already recovered to be adjusted against that liability. If the appeal is filed within time, the Appellate Authority is to decide it on merits without reference to limitation. The writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the matter was directed to the appellate forum. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788670 A writ challenge to a GST demand order was treated as inappropriate where a statutory appeal was available and the limitation for filing that appeal had already expired. The petitioner was nevertheless permitted to pursue the appellate remedy on compliance with a 25% pre-deposit of the disputed tax within the stipulated period, with any amount already recovered to be adjusted against that liability. If the appeal is filed within time, the Appellate Authority is to decide it on merits without reference to limitation. The writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the matter was directed to the appellate forum. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788670