<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1426 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788671</link>
    <description>Writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority against the impugned order. The court directed that, if the appeal is filed within thirty days, it must be entertained and decided on merits in accordance with law. The operative effect is that the petitioner&#039;s challenge is to proceed through the appellate remedy rather than in writ jurisdiction, subject to timely filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1426 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788671</link>
      <description>Writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority against the impugned order. The court directed that, if the appeal is filed within thirty days, it must be entertained and decided on merits in accordance with law. The operative effect is that the petitioner&#039;s challenge is to proceed through the appellate remedy rather than in writ jurisdiction, subject to timely filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>