https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788675 An efficacious statutory appeal under GST barred writ interference against an adjudication order on classification of spare parts and the resulting tax demand. The High Court held that the mere requirement of pre-deposit for filing the appeal was not, by itself, a sufficient ground to bypass the alternative remedy. Grievances about non-consideration of the reply and the factual or legal merits of the classification dispute were left to be examined in appeal. The writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy with all contentions reserved. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788675 An efficacious statutory appeal under GST barred writ interference against an adjudication order on classification of spare parts and the resulting tax demand. The High Court held that the mere requirement of pre-deposit for filing the appeal was not, by itself, a sufficient ground to bypass the alternative remedy. Grievances about non-consideration of the reply and the factual or legal merits of the classification dispute were left to be examined in appeal. The writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy with all contentions reserved. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788675