<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1433 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788678</link>
    <description>Service of GST notices only through the portal was held insufficient where the taxpayer&#039;s registration had already been cancelled, because effective communication is required and the person was no longer obliged to monitor the portal. The ex parte assessment and recovery proceedings were therefore vitiated for want of valid service. The court also held that, where an adverse assessment was contemplated, the statutory requirement of personal hearing and the rule of audi alteram partem had to be observed; absence of an effective hearing rendered the order unsustainable. The assessment order and recovery proceedings were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh after proper notice and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1433 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788678</link>
      <description>Service of GST notices only through the portal was held insufficient where the taxpayer&#039;s registration had already been cancelled, because effective communication is required and the person was no longer obliged to monitor the portal. The ex parte assessment and recovery proceedings were therefore vitiated for want of valid service. The court also held that, where an adverse assessment was contemplated, the statutory requirement of personal hearing and the rule of audi alteram partem had to be observed; absence of an effective hearing rendered the order unsustainable. The assessment order and recovery proceedings were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh after proper notice and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>