<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Monetary limit for departmental appeals barred the Revenue&#039;s challenge, and no substantial question of law arose.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98081</link>
    <description>HC declined to entertain the Revenue&#039;s departmental appeal because the amount involved fell below the monetary threshold prescribed in the circular dated 06.08.2024. The Court also found that the Tribunal&#039;s order did not raise any substantial question of law on merits. On both grounds, the appeal was dismissed, along with the connected application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Monetary limit for departmental appeals barred the Revenue&#039;s challenge, and no substantial question of law arose.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98081</link>
      <description>HC declined to entertain the Revenue&#039;s departmental appeal because the amount involved fell below the monetary threshold prescribed in the circular dated 06.08.2024. The Court also found that the Tribunal&#039;s order did not raise any substantial question of law on merits. On both grounds, the appeal was dismissed, along with the connected application.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:05:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>