https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467594 Earlier proceedings did not create a res judicata bar because they had decided only the tenant-status issue and not vesting of the lands in the State on the merits. The Court also treated the lands as plantation lands within the agricultural land regime and held that the retrospective deletion of the statutory prohibition removed the basis for the adverse possession direction. On that footing, the challenge to vesting succeeded, the possession order was quashed, and the revenue entries were restored in favour of the appellants. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Mar 2026 20:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467594 Earlier proceedings did not create a res judicata bar because they had decided only the tenant-status issue and not vesting of the lands in the State on the merits. The Court also treated the lands as plantation lands within the agricultural land regime and held that the retrospective deletion of the statutory prohibition removed the basis for the adverse possession direction. On that footing, the challenge to vesting succeeded, the possession order was quashed, and the revenue entries were restored in favour of the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467594