https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467595 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on a material part of the cause of action arising within the Court's local limits; the mere presence of some respondents in Delhi was insufficient where the appellant, the affiliated University, and the relevant representations were in Uttarakhand. Applying forum conveniens, the Court held that the dispute substantially arose in Uttarakhand and that the Uttarakhand High Court was the more appropriate forum. The writ petition's dismissal for lack of territorial jurisdiction was therefore sustained and the appeal failed. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Mar 2026 20:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467595 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on a material part of the cause of action arising within the Court's local limits; the mere presence of some respondents in Delhi was insufficient where the appellant, the affiliated University, and the relevant representations were in Uttarakhand. Applying forum conveniens, the Court held that the dispute substantially arose in Uttarakhand and that the Uttarakhand High Court was the more appropriate forum. The writ petition's dismissal for lack of territorial jurisdiction was therefore sustained and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467595