https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467596 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the pleaded facts form a material, essential and integral part of the cause of action, not on a stray or incidental connection. Where the arbitral award, the pending Section 34 challenge, and the recovery proceedings were all substantially connected with Agra, the Delhi connection was only incidental. Applying forum conveniens, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction could be declined because the dispute had its dominant territorial nexus elsewhere. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue remedies before the court having competent jurisdiction at Agra. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:29:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467596 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the pleaded facts form a material, essential and integral part of the cause of action, not on a stray or incidental connection. Where the arbitral award, the pending Section 34 challenge, and the recovery proceedings were all substantially connected with Agra, the Delhi connection was only incidental. Applying forum conveniens, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction could be declined because the dispute had its dominant territorial nexus elsewhere. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue remedies before the court having competent jurisdiction at Agra. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467596