<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467602</link>
    <description>Interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal followed coordinate bench decisions of the Mumbai ITAT allowing such deduction and applied the principle that, where taxing provisions admit divergent views, the interpretation favourable to the assessee should prevail. On that basis, the disallowance made in processing the return was held unsustainable, and the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 20:41:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467602</link>
      <description>Interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal followed coordinate bench decisions of the Mumbai ITAT allowing such deduction and applied the principle that, where taxing provisions admit divergent views, the interpretation favourable to the assessee should prevail. On that basis, the disallowance made in processing the return was held unsustainable, and the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>