<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467593</link>
    <description>A company struck off from the Register of Companies remained amenable to income-tax proceedings because the Companies Act preserves its existence for liabilities and obligations, including compliance with tax notices and assessment proceedings; the notice under section 148 and the reassessment were therefore valid. The addition for unexplained bank credits was also sustained because the assessee offered no source explanation before the lower authorities or the Tribunal, leaving the deposits unexplained and taxable under section 68. On both the jurisdictional objection and the merits of the cash credits, the challenge failed and the reassessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467593</link>
      <description>A company struck off from the Register of Companies remained amenable to income-tax proceedings because the Companies Act preserves its existence for liabilities and obligations, including compliance with tax notices and assessment proceedings; the notice under section 148 and the reassessment were therefore valid. The addition for unexplained bank credits was also sustained because the assessee offered no source explanation before the lower authorities or the Tribunal, leaving the deposits unexplained and taxable under section 68. On both the jurisdictional objection and the merits of the cash credits, the challenge failed and the reassessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>