<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2193 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467590</link>
    <description>A State-controlled textbook board was treated as an educational body because its objects were confined to preparing, publishing and distributing school textbooks to implement State education policy, and its governing structure was predominantly governmental; it was therefore held to exist solely for educational purposes and not for profit. The Tribunal also found that the board was wholly or substantially financed by the Government, as initial capital came from the State and relevant receipts were mainly derived from supply of books to Government schools under the State scheme; it therefore qualified for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). On that basis, denial of exemption and taxation as an AOP could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:55:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2193 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467590</link>
      <description>A State-controlled textbook board was treated as an educational body because its objects were confined to preparing, publishing and distributing school textbooks to implement State education policy, and its governing structure was predominantly governmental; it was therefore held to exist solely for educational purposes and not for profit. The Tribunal also found that the board was wholly or substantially financed by the Government, as initial capital came from the State and relevant receipts were mainly derived from supply of books to Government schools under the State scheme; it therefore qualified for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). On that basis, denial of exemption and taxation as an AOP could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>