<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 109 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty demand and penalties based on clubbing of clearances and allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods. The duty liability on job work charges was upheld, but the exact duty amount was remanded for quantification. The appeals were partially allowed, granting relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 109 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty demand and penalties based on clubbing of clearances and allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods. The duty liability on job work charges was upheld, but the exact duty amount was remanded for quantification. The appeals were partially allowed, granting relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>