<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 164 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50797</link>
    <description>Separately cleared bought-out and manufactured parts and accessories assessed under their own tariff headings were not includible in the assessable value of compressors merely on an SKD or unassembled-machine theory, absent proof that the compressors were actually cleared as a disassembled whole. The text also notes that allegations of under-valuation through shifting value to accessories, and the related assertions of suppression, extended period and penalty, must rest on reasoned evidence and analysis. Where that basis is lacking, the suppression finding and consequential demand and penalty cannot be sustained without fresh adjudication on valuation and related issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 164 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50797</link>
      <description>Separately cleared bought-out and manufactured parts and accessories assessed under their own tariff headings were not includible in the assessable value of compressors merely on an SKD or unassembled-machine theory, absent proof that the compressors were actually cleared as a disassembled whole. The text also notes that allegations of under-valuation through shifting value to accessories, and the related assertions of suppression, extended period and penalty, must rest on reasoned evidence and analysis. Where that basis is lacking, the suppression finding and consequential demand and penalty cannot be sustained without fresh adjudication on valuation and related issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>