<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50786</link>
    <description>Glass filled nylon insulating liners used in railway track fastening were treated as track fastening components for railway construction, not as electrical insulators. The classification turned on the product&#039;s true character and end use, with an earlier Tribunal decision on an identical product applied directly. Chapter Note 2(n) of Chapter 39 and the HSN Explanatory Notes supported classification as a plastic article under Item 3926.90, while the Chapter 85 description of electrical insulators did not prevail over the item&#039;s primary function. The Revenue&#039;s proposed classification under Item 8546.00 was rejected, and the product was classified under Item 3926.90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50786</link>
      <description>Glass filled nylon insulating liners used in railway track fastening were treated as track fastening components for railway construction, not as electrical insulators. The classification turned on the product&#039;s true character and end use, with an earlier Tribunal decision on an identical product applied directly. Chapter Note 2(n) of Chapter 39 and the HSN Explanatory Notes supported classification as a plastic article under Item 3926.90, while the Chapter 85 description of electrical insulators did not prevail over the item&#039;s primary function. The Revenue&#039;s proposed classification under Item 8546.00 was rejected, and the product was classified under Item 3926.90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>