<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 154 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50784</link>
    <description>For purposes of Modvat credit, the discussion centres on whether goods moved for job work, rather than by outright sale, can still satisfy the statutory definition of sale under Section 2(h). Transfer of possession in the ordinary course of trade or business is essential, but it must also be supported by cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. The analysis notes that the lower authorities treated continued ownership in the raw materials as decisive, without fully examining whether the transfer, despite no change in title, was nonetheless for valuable consideration. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 154 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50784</link>
      <description>For purposes of Modvat credit, the discussion centres on whether goods moved for job work, rather than by outright sale, can still satisfy the statutory definition of sale under Section 2(h). Transfer of possession in the ordinary course of trade or business is essential, but it must also be supported by cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. The analysis notes that the lower authorities treated continued ownership in the raw materials as decisive, without fully examining whether the transfer, despite no change in title, was nonetheless for valuable consideration. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>