<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 214 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, finding no justification for the confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, or penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining institutional decorum and following established legal procedures. The appeal was allowed, and the order-in-original was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 214 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, finding no justification for the confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, or penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining institutional decorum and following established legal procedures. The appeal was allowed, and the order-in-original was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>