<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1678 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467558</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), because the provision covers income by way of interest or dividends derived from investments with another co-operative society. The Tribunal held that section 80P(4) limits the deduction claim of a co-operative bank itself and does not bar the recipient society&#039;s claim under section 80P(2)(d). Revenue&#039;s reliance on Totgars was found misplaced on the facts, and earlier co-ordinate bench decisions supporting the assessee were followed. The deduction allowed by the CIT(A) was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1678 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467558</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), because the provision covers income by way of interest or dividends derived from investments with another co-operative society. The Tribunal held that section 80P(4) limits the deduction claim of a co-operative bank itself and does not bar the recipient society&#039;s claim under section 80P(2)(d). Revenue&#039;s reliance on Totgars was found misplaced on the facts, and earlier co-ordinate bench decisions supporting the assessee were followed. The deduction allowed by the CIT(A) was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>