<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1242 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788487</link>
    <description>Clearances made under invoices, with payments received through account payee cheques and sales to a Government undertaking, did not support any allegation of suppression or clandestine removal; the extended period of limitation could not be invoked and the demand failed on that basis. Contractual and record-based deductions for pro rata recovery, cash discount, trading turnover, freight and sales tax were supported by contemporaneous evidence, so assessable value had to be determined on the actual transaction value after permissible deductions. The confirmation of duty, interest and penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1242 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788487</link>
      <description>Clearances made under invoices, with payments received through account payee cheques and sales to a Government undertaking, did not support any allegation of suppression or clandestine removal; the extended period of limitation could not be invoked and the demand failed on that basis. Contractual and record-based deductions for pro rata recovery, cash discount, trading turnover, freight and sales tax were supported by contemporaneous evidence, so assessable value had to be determined on the actual transaction value after permissible deductions. The confirmation of duty, interest and penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>