<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1258 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788503</link>
    <description>Provision for contribution to a cadre fund was analysed for deductibility as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The note applies the test of a present obligation arising from a past event, probable outflow of resources, and reliable estimation under AS 29/Ind AS 37, and treats a reasonably quantified business liability as deductible even if future discharge is uncertain. It also refers to statutory or institutional cadre arrangements, actual fund utilisation, accounting treatment, and consistency with earlier years, together with coordinate bench precedent on identical facts. On that basis, the provision is regarded as an identifiable business liability rather than a contingent liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 10:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1258 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788503</link>
      <description>Provision for contribution to a cadre fund was analysed for deductibility as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The note applies the test of a present obligation arising from a past event, probable outflow of resources, and reliable estimation under AS 29/Ind AS 37, and treats a reasonably quantified business liability as deductible even if future discharge is uncertain. It also refers to statutory or institutional cadre arrangements, actual fund utilisation, accounting treatment, and consistency with earlier years, together with coordinate bench precedent on identical facts. On that basis, the provision is regarded as an identifiable business liability rather than a contingent liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>