<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1267 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788512</link>
    <description>Vehicle-related expenditure claimed against business income was allowed only to the extent supported by business nexus, because the assessee failed to prove exclusive use for business; on a reasonable estimate, 60% was permitted and 40% disallowed. Agricultural income was not liable to be reclassified as income from other sources, because ownership of agricultural land, past comparable returns, and the claim of leased agricultural operations sufficiently supported the receipt; the addition was deleted. The decision applies a partial allowance where business use is not fully proved, and rejects recharacterisation of supported agricultural income without contrary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1267 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788512</link>
      <description>Vehicle-related expenditure claimed against business income was allowed only to the extent supported by business nexus, because the assessee failed to prove exclusive use for business; on a reasonable estimate, 60% was permitted and 40% disallowed. Agricultural income was not liable to be reclassified as income from other sources, because ownership of agricultural land, past comparable returns, and the claim of leased agricultural operations sufficiently supported the receipt; the addition was deleted. The decision applies a partial allowance where business use is not fully proved, and rejects recharacterisation of supported agricultural income without contrary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>