<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1269 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788514</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act requires valid sanction for issue of notice, and a mere formal or mechanical approval under the approval provision does not satisfy the statutory safeguard. The article applies the principle that where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted. On the stated facts, the approving authority&#039;s brief endorsement showed no real application of mind, so the sanction was treated as mechanical. That defective approval vitiated jurisdiction for reopening, and the reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1269 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788514</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act requires valid sanction for issue of notice, and a mere formal or mechanical approval under the approval provision does not satisfy the statutory safeguard. The article applies the principle that where conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views exist, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted. On the stated facts, the approving authority&#039;s brief endorsement showed no real application of mind, so the sanction was treated as mechanical. That defective approval vitiated jurisdiction for reopening, and the reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>