<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1280 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788525</link>
    <description>Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was treated as available up to the revised threshold limit reflected in the CBDT notification. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate Bench decisions on the same issue and, in the absence of any contrary material from the Revenue, applied consistency to reject restriction of the exemption to the earlier limit. The assessee&#039;s claim was therefore allowed within the revised limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1280 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788525</link>
      <description>Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was treated as available up to the revised threshold limit reflected in the CBDT notification. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate Bench decisions on the same issue and, in the absence of any contrary material from the Revenue, applied consistency to reject restriction of the exemption to the earlier limit. The assessee&#039;s claim was therefore allowed within the revised limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>