<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 212 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving the assessable value of imported painted statues back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. It emphasized the need for fair adjudication and directed the Appellants to respond to the Addendum within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of expeditious adjudication within three months, considering the goods were still in the Department&#039;s possession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 212 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving the assessable value of imported painted statues back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. It emphasized the need for fair adjudication and directed the Appellants to respond to the Addendum within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of expeditious adjudication within three months, considering the goods were still in the Department&#039;s possession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>