https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788546 Questions on e-way bill generation, validity and procedure in bill-to-ship-to and related movement scenarios were held to fall outside the matters eligible for advance ruling under the CGST Act, as they did not fit any category in Section 97(2). The authority noted that e-way bill requirements are already governed by Chapter XVI of the CGST Rules, 2017. As the application sought rulings on issues beyond the statutory remit of advance ruling, it was not admissible under Section 98(2). The application was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788546 Questions on e-way bill generation, validity and procedure in bill-to-ship-to and related movement scenarios were held to fall outside the matters eligible for advance ruling under the CGST Act, as they did not fit any category in Section 97(2). The authority noted that e-way bill requirements are already governed by Chapter XVI of the CGST Rules, 2017. As the application sought rulings on issues beyond the statutory remit of advance ruling, it was not admissible under Section 98(2). The application was therefore rejected. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788546