<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 187 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50760</link>
    <description>Where removals were made under an approved classification list and all material facts were disclosed, the extended limitation period under central excise law was unavailable absent fraud, suppression, or wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty. The demand was therefore time-barred because the show cause notices were issued beyond the normal period and a later change of view on classification could not revive limitation. The associated interest demand for the earlier period was also held unsustainable in light of the statutory provision relied upon. The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 187 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50760</link>
      <description>Where removals were made under an approved classification list and all material facts were disclosed, the extended limitation period under central excise law was unavailable absent fraud, suppression, or wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty. The demand was therefore time-barred because the show cause notices were issued beyond the normal period and a later change of view on classification could not revive limitation. The associated interest demand for the earlier period was also held unsustainable in light of the statutory provision relied upon. The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>