<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DCF valuation for unquoted shares cannot be replaced by NAV absent statutory power; AO&#039;s substitution was held impermissible.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98000</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA allows an assessee to choose a prescribed valuation method for unquoted shares, including a DCF valuation supported by a merchant banker or valuer. The AO cannot independently replace that chosen method with NAV merely because later financial results differ from projections, since valuation is a matter of estimation and not exact science. Applying that principle, the ITAT held the AO&#039;s rejection of the DCF report and substitution of NAV to determine fair market value was not permissible and set aside the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DCF valuation for unquoted shares cannot be replaced by NAV absent statutory power; AO&#039;s substitution was held impermissible.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98000</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA allows an assessee to choose a prescribed valuation method for unquoted shares, including a DCF valuation supported by a merchant banker or valuer. The AO cannot independently replace that chosen method with NAV merely because later financial results differ from projections, since valuation is a matter of estimation and not exact science. Applying that principle, the ITAT held the AO&#039;s rejection of the DCF report and substitution of NAV to determine fair market value was not permissible and set aside the addition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:12:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>