<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50759</link>
    <description>Section 35E review directions must be issued within one year of the order sought to be reviewed, and a limitation objection fails where the record does not show that the direction was made beyond that period. For captively consumed goods, valuation does not proceed by reference to a sale price under Section 4(1)(a); it is determined under Section 4(1)(b) and the valuation rules. Where comparable goods are available, Rule 6(b)(1) applies on that basis, and the cost-of-production method under Rule 6(b)(2) is used only if comparable-goods valuation is unavailable. The higher price charged to another class of buyers was therefore not decisive, and no deduction of profit was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50759</link>
      <description>Section 35E review directions must be issued within one year of the order sought to be reviewed, and a limitation objection fails where the record does not show that the direction was made beyond that period. For captively consumed goods, valuation does not proceed by reference to a sale price under Section 4(1)(a); it is determined under Section 4(1)(b) and the valuation rules. Where comparable goods are available, Rule 6(b)(1) applies on that basis, and the cost-of-production method under Rule 6(b)(2) is used only if comparable-goods valuation is unavailable. The higher price charged to another class of buyers was therefore not decisive, and no deduction of profit was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>