<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1669 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467538</link>
    <description>Penalties under section 271(1)(b) and section 272A(1)(d) were deleted because the Tribunal accepted that the assessee had shown reasonable cause for the defaults. After examining the appeal record and the material placed before it, the ITAT held that sustaining the penalties was not justified on the facts and circumstances demonstrated by the assessee. The appeals were therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 20:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1669 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467538</link>
      <description>Penalties under section 271(1)(b) and section 272A(1)(d) were deleted because the Tribunal accepted that the assessee had shown reasonable cause for the defaults. After examining the appeal record and the material placed before it, the ITAT held that sustaining the penalties was not justified on the facts and circumstances demonstrated by the assessee. The appeals were therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>