<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50752</link>
    <description>Sintering cold rolled steel strips with copper alloy powder produced a bimetallic steel backed copper alloy strip, not a copper coated steel strip, for purposes of Notification No. 232/88-C.E. The decisive point was that the process created a bonded powder-metallurgy product rather than a coating in the sense required by the exemption notification. As a result, the goods did not satisfy the notification&#039;s condition for concessional treatment, and the exemption was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50752</link>
      <description>Sintering cold rolled steel strips with copper alloy powder produced a bimetallic steel backed copper alloy strip, not a copper coated steel strip, for purposes of Notification No. 232/88-C.E. The decisive point was that the process created a bonded powder-metallurgy product rather than a coating in the sense required by the exemption notification. As a result, the goods did not satisfy the notification&#039;s condition for concessional treatment, and the exemption was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>