<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1620 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467528</link>
    <description>Unmanufactured tobacco remains outside a prohibition aimed at food products where jaggery-water sprinkling and leaf-cutting do not transform it into a manufactured product. Section 3(1)(j) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 was considered, but Regulation 2.3.4 of the 2011 Regulations was held inapplicable because tobacco and nicotine were not added as ingredients in any food product; nicotine was inherent in the leaf, and the test reports did not show any increase in nicotine content from the petitioners&#039; process. The restraint orders and notices were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, and the sale ban was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1620 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467528</link>
      <description>Unmanufactured tobacco remains outside a prohibition aimed at food products where jaggery-water sprinkling and leaf-cutting do not transform it into a manufactured product. Section 3(1)(j) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 was considered, but Regulation 2.3.4 of the 2011 Regulations was held inapplicable because tobacco and nicotine were not added as ingredients in any food product; nicotine was inherent in the leaf, and the test reports did not show any increase in nicotine content from the petitioners&#039; process. The restraint orders and notices were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, and the sale ban was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>