<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clarification regarding regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of APGST Rules, 2017 in cases where the exporters had imported certain inputs without payment of integrated taxes and compensation cess</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=69540</link>
    <description>Clarification is issued on regularization of refund of IGST paid on exports where inputs were initially imported without payment of integrated tax and compensation cess under the specified customs exemption notifications, but later the importer pays those taxes with interest and gets the Bill of Entry reassessed. In such cases, the benefit of the notifications is treated as not having been availed for the purpose of rule 96(10) of the APGST Rules, 2017, and the refund of IGST on exports is not considered to be in contravention of that sub-rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification regarding regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of APGST Rules, 2017 in cases where the exporters had imported certain inputs without payment of integrated taxes and compensation cess</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=69540</link>
      <description>Clarification is issued on regularization of refund of IGST paid on exports where inputs were initially imported without payment of integrated tax and compensation cess under the specified customs exemption notifications, but later the importer pays those taxes with interest and gets the Bill of Entry reassessed. In such cases, the benefit of the notifications is treated as not having been availed for the purpose of rule 96(10) of the APGST Rules, 2017, and the refund of IGST on exports is not considered to be in contravention of that sub-rule.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>GST - States</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=69540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>