<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1207 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788452</link>
    <description>Bail was refused where the court found a prima facie case from call detail records, witness statements, video footage and recovery material indicating the petitioners&#039; alleged role in mobilising a violent mob, obstructing investigation and influencing witnesses. The court balanced prolonged custody against the gravity of the alleged attack on investigating officials, damage to government property and the risk of tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses, and held that the co-accused on bail were not similarly circumstanced. Delayed recording of some witness statements was treated as a matter for trial, not a ground to displace the incriminating material at this stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1207 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788452</link>
      <description>Bail was refused where the court found a prima facie case from call detail records, witness statements, video footage and recovery material indicating the petitioners&#039; alleged role in mobilising a violent mob, obstructing investigation and influencing witnesses. The court balanced prolonged custody against the gravity of the alleged attack on investigating officials, damage to government property and the risk of tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses, and held that the co-accused on bail were not similarly circumstanced. Delayed recording of some witness statements was treated as a matter for trial, not a ground to displace the incriminating material at this stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>