<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788470</link>
    <description>Under section 153C, completed assessments can be disturbed only where incriminating material belonging to, or relatable to, the assessee is found during search; general seized material, disclosed entries or third-party ledgers are insufficient. On that principle, earlier assessment years were treated as unsustainable because no such specific material existed qua the assessee. For later years, the block period for a person other than the searched person was computed from the date the seized material reached the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, so the assessments fell within the six-year search framework and could not validly be framed under section 143(3). The challenged assessments were therefore set aside on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788470</link>
      <description>Under section 153C, completed assessments can be disturbed only where incriminating material belonging to, or relatable to, the assessee is found during search; general seized material, disclosed entries or third-party ledgers are insufficient. On that principle, earlier assessment years were treated as unsustainable because no such specific material existed qua the assessee. For later years, the block period for a person other than the searched person was computed from the date the seized material reached the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, so the assessments fell within the six-year search framework and could not validly be framed under section 143(3). The challenged assessments were therefore set aside on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>